Background: Patient dignity is a critical component of health care; however, evidence suggests that it is often inadequately maintained, particularly among nursing students. Purpose: To assess the impact of a dignity-in-care training intervention on nursing students’ knowledge and explore how they apply it in their practice after graduation. Methods: This was a mixed-methods study involving second-year nursing students with interventions provided by a psycho- oncologist. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-training questionnaires on dignity, while qualitative data were obtained from focus groups and semi-structured interviews conducted 1 and 2 years after the training. The analysis included McNemar’s test for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative results. Results: Sixty-four students completed the pre- and post-training assessments. Significant improvements were observed in emotional and psychosocial dignity-related domains; however, declines were noted in procedural domains. Conclusions: Future interventions should adopt a comprehensive approach, possibly co-led by nurses and psychologists, to uphold dignity in care.
“Teach for Dignity”: Longitudinal Evaluation of Training on Dignity-in-Care Relationships for Nursing Students / Buonaccorso, Loredana; Ghirotto, Luca; Amaducci, Giovanna; Soncini, Silvia; Kaleci, Shaniko; Iorio, Giusy; Mecugni, Daniela. - In: NURSE EDUCATOR. - ISSN 0363-3624. - 50:6(2025), pp. E396-E402. [10.1097/NNE.0000000000001970]
“Teach for Dignity”: Longitudinal Evaluation of Training on Dignity-in-Care Relationships for Nursing Students
Loredana Buonaccorso
;Luca Ghirotto;Giovanna Amaducci;Silvia Soncini;Kaleci Shaniko;Daniela Mecugni.Funding Acquisition
2025
Abstract
Background: Patient dignity is a critical component of health care; however, evidence suggests that it is often inadequately maintained, particularly among nursing students. Purpose: To assess the impact of a dignity-in-care training intervention on nursing students’ knowledge and explore how they apply it in their practice after graduation. Methods: This was a mixed-methods study involving second-year nursing students with interventions provided by a psycho- oncologist. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-training questionnaires on dignity, while qualitative data were obtained from focus groups and semi-structured interviews conducted 1 and 2 years after the training. The analysis included McNemar’s test for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative results. Results: Sixty-four students completed the pre- and post-training assessments. Significant improvements were observed in emotional and psychosocial dignity-related domains; however, declines were noted in procedural domains. Conclusions: Future interventions should adopt a comprehensive approach, possibly co-led by nurses and psychologists, to uphold dignity in care.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
_teach_for_dignity___longitudinal_evaluation_of.32.pdf
Open access
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Licenza:
[IR] creative-commons
Dimensione
214.24 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
214.24 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris




